October 29, 2008

HOMELAND SECURITY, TSA, and Me




"Even the Catholic Church of the Middle Ages was tolerant by modern standards. Part of the reason for this was that in the past no government had the power to keep its citizens under constant surveillance. The invention of print, however, made it easier to manipulate public opinion, and the film and the radio carried the process further. With the development of television, and the technical advance which made it possible to receive and transmit simultaneously on the same instrument, private life came to an end." Part 2, Chapter 9, pg. 206
-- George Orwell, “1984”

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is a U.S. government agency that was created as part of the Aviation and Transportation Security Act passed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush on November 19, 2001. The TSA was originally organized in the U.S. Department of Transportation but was moved to the U. S. Department of Homeland Security in 2002.The agency is responsible for security (sic) in all modes of transportation.

VISITOR ANALYSIS
Referring Link
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=randall%20tessier&aq=f&oq=
Host Name
pnxuser1.tsa.dhs.gov
IP Address
129.33.119.12 [Label IP Address]
Country
United States
Region
Maryland
City
Pasadena
ISP
Ibm
Returning Visits
0
Visit Length
4 mins 28 secs
VISITOR SYSTEM SPECS
Browser
MSIE 6.0
Operating System
Windows XP
Resolution
1024x768
Javascript
Enabled



Dear TSA (Homeland Security Agency) “Kip”:

What follows is a reprint of my post from July 22, 2008. Since you were so kind to return today for an extended visit, I thought it only fitting that I express my deepest regards and profound gratitude for your thoughtful concern.

Best – Randall L. Tessier

Dear TSA:First, I’d like to thank that most esteemed branch of Homeland Security, the TSA (Transportation Security Administration) for visiting my blog yesterday with some frequency. Your, as well as many others, interest in my blog ensures the fact that my site will continue to enjoy its lofty status on Google’s search engine. It is also comforting to know your dot.gov oversight is ever vigilant in tracking subversive clowns such as I, who sow the seeds of intelligence among the subservient masses. It’s good that you perceive my feeble attempts to stamp out ignorance as a threat to the status quo. After all, the dissemination and perpetuation of fear and ignorance has been critical to the maintenance of your neo-conservative agenda. Keep up the good work.

Yours Truly – General Jack Ripper

PS: Always remember, little brother is watching.

October 27, 2008

Fiction




“To say, for example, that a man is made up of certain chemical elements is a satisfactory description only for those who intend to use him as a fertilizer.”
-- H. J. Muller 1890-1967: Science and Criticism (1943)

The source of the Yellow Dog is a remote place, a land of isolated hideouts and non-flaneurs. Where the river is a half a mile wide, invisible beneath two feet of ice. Atop the ice, the snow is four feet deep. East and west as far as the eye can see there is unbroken whiteness. Here the sun is felt as an absence, a smokey warm sign that gives the intractable cold its relative value. The landscape is as emotionally seductive as it is physically unforgiving, its strangeness at once beckoning the imagination and warning it to flee.

On this desolate tract, just west of the Huron Mountains and north of Michigame, where the Huron dumps into Lake Superior, there is an abandoned mine shaft. This portal is the entrance to a network of underground compounds. According to Plutonian protocol, these quarters are collectively known as Drang nach Osten.

At Three Lakes, while observing Stilz's driving suspiciously, Bokasa points north. They grind on, winding into the pine through intermitent Birch stands, craggy rock overhangs, and blinding blasts of freezing fir pollen. Careening down the grade, they skid dangerously and come perilously close to sliding into the gulleyed shoulder. Stilz has no touch on the brake and gas, driving the Hummer like a tank instead of a sled. He's leery, wary of the mirrored reflection of a pursuing Navigator, paranoid.

Coming through the S curve at Eagle's Nest they nearly lose it to an enormous Maple, its massive trunk’s invitation-“die here." They barely miss it. The ice from iron bumper smashes the windshield with such force they instinctively duck, the sun blotted out.

As the pinpoint brilliance of the sun bows to the dull glare of brief sunset they arrive, finally, at a half buried Quonset hut that marks the edge of Pluto's domain--Drang nach oster. The barely tolerable chill of day is now a harsh twilight cold, slouching toward the night’s deep bonechill.

"Take me to Peacock," Bokasa barked at no one in particular. Random bursts of condensing vapors obscure them as they entered their voice and palm prints. Inside, the floors are immaculate reflections of obscure Tibetan, Mayan, and Ogibway glyphs that move the eyes toward the lab area. Peacock's techno-lair is a clinically lit, scrupulously anal, glassily sculpted, strategically administered world. And there, Peacock: pear shaped, hair artificially swept across the pate, coke bottle eyeglassed in his wheelchaired flatulence.

As Bokasa jockeyed his withered legs into position to use the catheter, Peacock spoke.

"Please signifier, my rat. Xerxes. Note his agility, his grace on the trapeze and wheel. Hail Xerxes! Don't you see? A miracle."

The half-cocked head signaled that dreaded mix of skepticism and unbridled rage Bokasa was notorious for, but he let Peacock continue.

"We have extracted the immature cells of adult rats, nursed them to grow and implanted them in the gap where Xerxes's spinal cord was severed. Only two weeks ago Xerxes lay paralysed, unable to move. But now, behold! You will walk, Signifier. We will all walk!"

"Hold your tounge," Bokasa whispered menacingly. His wary disbelief voicing a tone of denial so pervasive, so ingrained in that cruel moment of being that was his life, that he now refused to imagine that what he had so long dreamed of.

"How did you do it?"

Knowing Bokasa's intolerance for shade, nuance, and digression, Peacock chose his words carefully. "We took spinal-cord cells that had matured to the progenitor stage from adult animals, developed, or differentiated enough, to belong generally to the spinal cord, but not enough to be assigned to any specific part of the cord. Then, in a petri dish inside an incubator with the proper nutrients, heat, and oxygen supply, the cells regenerated into a large enough population to begin tissue growth. However, at this stage we prevented the cells from differentiating. We hoped that the spinal cord might function in a way that the mass regeneration of spinal tissue would reconnect the severed section. This was in opposition of course to the traditional wisdom, which holds that these spinal connections require a precision anagolous to the reconnection of electrical wires. On this hypothesis we introduced the not-fully differentiated progenitor cells in a four-millimeter break in Xerxes' spinal cord. The motor skills of the creature you see before you are evidence of the gaps' regeneration into a new functional section. We rightly assumed that the undifferentiated progenitor cells, if left to their own devices, would sort themselves into the right order, and produce all the necessary functions. And this is precisely what happened. What we have accomplished is unprecedented."

While Peacock explained, Bokasa imagined himself whole. Not, psychologically, he would never be that, but physically. What new cruelties his mobility might allow him was only a secondary concern. The idea, to walk, to stand, to have others perceive him as whole, unwheeled, freestanding, was overwhelming. He suddenly imagined himself standing, moving freely about, substituting his physical liberation for others'incapacities, envisioning a pent-up vengance yet inflicted. Bokasa's reverie, his blessed, profound distraction, was such that he was unable to hear how Peacock's research had also identified a gene that prevents the brain and spinal cord from rewiring themselves after an injury.

"We have solved the mystery of why the connections in the central nervous system--the brain and spinal cord--can't repair themselves, when the connections in the peripheral nervous system can." Peacock's animated enthusiasm, his ecstatic tone, only heightened Bokasa's self-absorbed incomprehension.

"The answer is that the "Blox" protein, a substance that prevents nerve cell connections from regenerating after they are cut, is present in the central nervous system, but not in other nerves. Our team has created an antibody that blocks the "Blox" protein."

Bokasa listened in stunned silence. It was one of those moments that signal a boundary between what one is and what one is about to become, that epiphany that marks a shift in one's paradigm of self definition, from perception to comprehension, this was that moment for Bokasa. He was re-conceptualizing the harsh reality of disability as a nightmare he might awaken from. Like the chrysalis that becomes a butterfly, he was on the verge of seeing life as a dream, a light that illuminates a dark lifetime of past behavior, offering a beacon into what might be. It was not that Bokasa wouldn’t speak as much as he couldn’t.

"Signifier, Signifier. Are you listening?" Peacock inquired warily. "We have developed a three-pronged therapy involving a 'Blox' blocker, an agent to boost nerve growth, and spinal cord cells transplanted from fresh cadavers that has restored Xerxes's motor skills."

Though Bokasa couldn't know it, the crippled nature of his response system now served him well. If character is given us by our circumstances, and that range circumscribes the possibilities of identity, then Bokasa was given little; but even that limited scope available to him lay unexplored. "What other miracles has your research wrought,” Bokasa said, his singular blend of dispassionate sarcasm disguising his hysterical hope.

"This is only the beginning, Signifier. Not only can we make you whole, we can extend your life, the life of our founder, and the lives of the inner circle." Peacock's unbridled enthusiasm, mirrored in Bokassa's far away eyes, spurred him to newer, even more wondrous revelations.

"We can now control the destiny of human embryonic stem cells--dictate that they become a fresh heart or glistening new muscle. We have found a way to produce spare parts that can prolong life indefinitely. We can clone your cells, Signifier, thus creating an early embryo, which would create spare parts."

"We have acheived the grail of eternal life. The embryonic stem cell is the key to immortaliy. This single cell has the potential--the genetic coding and biological adaptability to become any cell, any tissue, or any organ. We have found the key to triggering its potential to become lung tissue or heart muscle, or retinal cells that cure blindness!

"Each and every tissue derived from these stem cells would provide and exact, immunological match. The single biggest obstacle to organ transplantation, matching tissue, has been overcome. Alzheimers disease, paralytic nerve damage, multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy--all disorders that have plagued our Signifiers--will be no more. Virtually every part of the human organism can be replicated. We can stop the aging process at any biological age we choose."

"But even better for our purposes, most Holy one, we can replace the brain, thus manipulating self-identity itself--that thing that defines who we are! And this, Signifier, brings me to the third, and perhaps most important aspect of our three pronged strategy. Besides restoration and reinvigoration, we can also reprogram. We have identified family and ethnic clusters, groups of genetically related individuals who manifest the relevant symptoms, or tendencies to develop certain conditions and behaviors. We can, in genetic terms, harvest these psychological predispositions." "In short, we can dictate the dynamics of our followers' moral value systems, and, in this sense, control the intensity of their ideological conviction--their faith in the Plutonic mission."

Bokasa's eyes lit up with that kind of thoughtful menace cultivated by a life of cruelty; A look of gloating self-certainty; of his unswerving belief that an innate Machiavellian aggression at the most personal level was normal, and not deviant, behavior.

Peacock continued. "As are all animals, we are innately ruthless in our desires; but we are born into a web of arbitrary and inexorable social expectation. We may have the capacity for gentility, but this is no more self-evident than our need to vent aggression, to dehumanize, to inflict pain, to demonize, to torture and murder. This is in our genes. The status of the moral sense--values associated with right and wrong--has no evolutionary foundation. Moral codes are ideological conceptions, not biological dispositions. The myth of a moral inner compass is a construct of competing interest groups. The conquest of the weak by the strong is the decree of nature. The science of evolutionary psychology has opened the way for us to map and control the dynamics of thought, of consciousness as having an organic basis. By manipulating hormones, enzymes and stem-cell factors we can literally produce a world-view. Voila! Instant weltanschaung. Canned conviction. Test-tube faith. Chemically induced philosophies of belief!

We can create criminality. We have isolated genes that bring about mental illness, and discovered how the manipulation of oxytocin levels can control the inclination to love, or hate. Our drives, urges, passions, politics, and spiritual beliefs are reducible to the sciences: genetics, molecular biology, pharmacology, neurology and endocrinology.

October 25, 2008

The New Republic


"Ignorance is an evil weed, which dictators may cultivate among their dupes, but which no democracy can afford among its citizens."
-- William Henry Beveridge 1879-1963: "Full Employment in a Free society" (1944)

Dear Readers:

For years I subscribed to The New Republic. They have one of the greatest film reviewers of all time, Stanley Kauffmann, a sophisticated arts section, sensational book reviews, and the kind of intellectual reportage that requires critical investment and thoughtful consideration. While I think Harpers Magazine and the Manchester Guardian are better, TNR is far and away superior to The New Yorker and Atlantic. When I knew last fall I would be staying at home with nothing to do but drink, take oxys, and enjoy my chemo, I had Brigitte take all of these magazines (which she kindly paid for).

Why, you may ask, had I let my subscription to TNR lapse? Because even the most intelligent journalism can err in its judgment, making that most fatal choice of confusing knowledge with wisdom. How unwise TNR was when it endorsed George Bush for president! And how much they were akin to the lemming-like public that now clamors to jump back up the cliff they so gleefully leapt from. As if American Exceptionalism might somehow defy gravity. The foolish public that voted this charlatan in now reminds me of Peter's denial after the Crucifixion. Condemning, castigating, and railing mightily against the idiot they put in office, they are now deaf to the cock's third crow. In fact, as it invariably happens, when I ask those who put forth the loudest protestations, remonstrations, and denunciations, "who did you vote for"?, their self righteous yaking becomes not a shout, but a whisper. "Bush," they quietly admit. To which I, in my best Limbaughian pomposity, reply, "then fercrissakes shutup."

Now comes TNR's endorsement of Obama: "The past eight years have been like watching a TV makeover show in reverse. We entered the Bush era a ravishing beauty attracting envious stares. We leave it a gum-smacking sad sack with split ends and an empty social calendar. Over the course of George W. Bush's second term, in particular, the images of our country have not just been unattractive but virtually apocalyptic: a major city destroyed; cars raining into the Mississippi from a crumbling bridge; swaths of exurbia dotted with foreclosed homes; a financial system in ruins; angry emotionalism flooding politics." Can you call the editors of an esteemed national magazine a bunch of stupid dipshits? I suppose the Brits would call this "bad form." Then again, these snaggle-toothed, pallorless, wannabes--the English--have heretofore been our staunchest allies in pursing the folly of Iraq. They should all move to the continent and take civility lessons from the French, Germans, and Swedes.

Congratulations TNR, you've come to your senses. Let's hope your endorsement's not too late to save our ruined country, a nation that's lost its moral compass. "Apocalyptic" indeed!

There is more to being an American than wrapping oneself in the flag and espousing a blowhard terrorist patriotism. There is the matter of being a compassionate world citizen, a person who realizes that, in the words of the "Gonzo Dog Band," 'we're all bozos on this bus.' A sham-tram on which our gangster administration has been asleep at the wheel; recklessly, and unilaterally, mowing down innocent foreign civilians; stripping us of our civil rights; torturing human beings; and ignoring the plight of a suffering world that desperately needs our help.
Instead, our taxes fund senseless wars in faraway places where our sons and daughters die for nothing; lavish AIG soirees and hunting parties; bail outs of an obscenely rich ruling class that comprises 5% of the population and controls 95% of the wealth; donations to outrageously greedy banks; and Saks Fifth Avenue wardrobes for a mindless "let them eat cake" bimbo and her toady and senile lackey .

Horror of horrors! How dare someone--and an uppity quadroon at that--put forth the scurrilous and offensive idea of spreading the wealth around! For shame, Mr. Barack Hussein Obama!

In between whining about our 401K's going down the drain, and the declining value of our homes and portfolios, we might take note of the plight of our fellow human beings and seriously consider the Christian ethic we so righteously trumpet and blindly ignore (click on the photos above): "There, but for the grace of God, go I."

October 21, 2008

Ineffability and the Wisdom of Language


“There’s a cool web of language winds
us in,
Retreat from too much joy or too
much fear.”
-- Robert Graves 1895-1985: “The Cool Web” (1927)

If consciousness is an oceanic aspect of being, then language is like the surface of the rough or placid waters that conceal our thoughts and memories. The hyacinths, submerged stumps, sharks, and dark, silent depths of what compises conscious and unconscious mind can never be fully revealed to those around us, whether strangers, friends, or loved ones--nor, perhaps, should they be. We think we see, collate, and assemble our perceptions in a coherent fashion; and yet dreams, imaginings, fixations, and uncontrollable nightmares and fantasies counter this traditional model/assumption. I can love you while harboring longings and resentments that must never be spoken. The folly of wishing someone close might plug into your mind, or vice versa, may sound romantic, but it would doom the that all important dichotomy between self and other that ensures self-autonomy, and thus the capacity for care and compassion. After all, conciousness loses its purchase without consciousness of others, and there can be no such consciousness without the delineation of self/other. As an example, I might plug into your mind during a private reverie I could never reconcile with your affection for me. Or, you might intrude on my private world during my struggle, while not outwardly manifest, with a severe anxiety or panic attack. The beauty of language, then, is its capacity to filter the swirl of consciousness into a mode that synchronizes human interaction. It allows us to, in a way, create the persona we gift to others by self-editing who we are. This implies we are always uncertain of who we really are, you say. But perhaps a constant uncertainty about our core identity, who we are, is better than a self-absolutism that leaves no room for the fluidity of experience, and the way that flux changes our perceptions of self and other in a kind of Heisenbergian psychonalytical way. The language of my interpersonal exchanges with you functions as a pen that contains my demons as much as a method of social interaction. That thin line between love and hate, or perhaps better, the compartmentalization of the inevitable ambivalence/ambiguity that comes with intimate emotional attachment, is maintained through language, and our choice, or lack thereof, of what to say and when to say it. Would that I had always been able to control my own sea-snakes and subliminal demons. For me, one positive outcome of having been ill has been a keener awareness of the distinction between the inner dynamics of being (contents of consciousness) and the words I choose to externally articulate this in my interactions with others.
Love - Randy

October 18, 2008

Murder Most Foul!



Dear Readers:

Mike Stadler, a true son of the north, sophisticated intellect, and wonderful singer-songwriter (check out his new CD, "North Country"), has left some interesting comments on substance abuse (see Big Bay Chronicles: Local Color and Oxys in Covington), the sulfide mining controversy (Upper Peninsula Journal: Save Kennicott and Arm the Bears), and BIID (BIID: Philosophical or Medical Issue?).

Mike's post on BIID is a kindly response (take a look at it Bill) to another well educated (St. John's alumnus) friend of us all, Bill Debroux. By the way Bill, thanks for the props on the George Bedard post.

Lastly, some time ago I alluded to the fact that one of our northern brethren was acquainted with John Norman Collins, the infamous Michigan Murderer, who is presently incarcerated in Marquette State Prison. Little did I know that a set of circumstances would arise in which one of Collins's alleged victims from some 40 years ago would become an issue in my circle of friends. As it turns out, a drummer I work with was playing at the club (The Depot House) where, shortly before her body was found, Alice Kalom was last seen on June 7, 1969.

Friends, this is no fiction. I'll post the full details on my next blog entry.

October 17, 2008

George Bedard


"Good music is that which penetrates the ear with facility and quits the memory with difficulty."

-- Thomas Beecham 1879-1961: speech, c.1950; in New York Times 9 March 1961


Dear Readers:

Tonight George Bedard and the Kingpins will be at the Club Heidelberg. If you are in the Ann Arbor area, please stop in at the 5:30-8:30 Happy Hour and enjoy one of the finest guitar players in the world.

Best - Randy

October 16, 2008

ficTiOn



“Babylon in all its desolation is a sight not so awful as that of the human mind in ruins.”
-- Scrope Davies c.1782-1852: letter to Thomas Raikes, May 1835

To realistically convey what happened on the evening of 2011 is impossible, and perhaps inappropriate. A convention of Hell is its unspeakable nature, which sometimes leavens the horrors of the inferno, but which can also torment the imagination in a way that makes damnations fires all the worse. How to describe an act that even the perpetrator disbelieves? How to bring order to the chaos of memories that even to this day Nicole Merryweather refuses to acknowledge?
North of Queen City, in the Village of Birch, Stekel and Nicole became separated. Stekel went to the bathroom and when he returned she had vanished; we know that evening she went in the direction of the docks. On the infamous Waterfront Boulevard she may have wandered into the Roosevelt or Venice. In these dens of Jagermeister and Ecstacy, under the strobe and throb of Finnish Hip Hop, she may have found herself caught in the black light, gazed upon in electric motley, and undressed by violating eyes--but it is more likely that she searched unnoticed, through the obscure streets...

She carefully noted the ways of the tavern women. Finally, she found a group of men from the Plutonist-Zeit-Brigade. Carefully she chose an arch-misogynist she perceived to be a hater of people in general, so that her sin might be mitigated by its moral purpose, and that her crime would be even easier to commit. She signaled the man with a flourish of thigh. He led her through a maze of basement corridors and then down a hallway into a small room illuminated by a single naked bulb. He closed the door.

Time seems suspended in moments of supreme significance, whether this sign is one of desolation or ecstatic joy matters little. The doors of perception, temporal gateways, become unhinged. At these moments the present is forced to bear its heaviest burden; when life is suddenly sapped of the strength to throw the now into the then; when the illusion of chronology is caught in its lie.

In this atemporal suspension, in the eternal present of unconscious perception, did Nicole Merryweather reflect even for a moment on the death that inspired her obsession? It is probable she thought about it just long enough to compromise her plan. She thought (there was no escaping it) that the violation she was now inviting was atonement for her disease, that moment long ago when her body set up her father's death.

But out of the pyre of this self-degradation, like a Phoenix from the ashes, her personal revenge on the collective violence of the ages, would rise up and sweep away the guilt and sorrow. She thought this with submissive rapture, and then immediately fled to the sanctuary of obliviousness.

The man--an Italian or Finn--did not speak English; he would be Nicole's avenging scepter; as she was his deliverance from carnal desire--but she was an object of pleasure, while he was a mock-sacrificial lamb on the altar of retribution. In Nicole's solitude she dreamed with eyes wide shut.

In her black lace panties was the money he had promised. She flushed the bills down the toilet. While putting on her clothes a mixture of sorrow and disgust welled up in Nicole's soul. In chiaroscuro, the room was light and shadow, the dusk offering a Poe-esque setting. Furtively, she fled the scene. At the Little Garlic Bridge she got into a rented Cherokee, and sticking to her purpose headed north for Squaw Beach.

The onrushing present pushed the memory of what had happened into the blessed past. She rode through stands of timber and granite that assured her of nature's obliviousness to existence. Paradoxically, her abject despair turned to resolve, for it reinforced her commitment to the details of her plan and blinded her to matters of motive and intention.

In the minds of the locals, Claude Guerre was quite simply a psychotic recluse; to those few who knew him well a criminal sociopath. Earlier in that year he had howled at the moon in the Big Bay cemetery, leaving what little money and jewelry he had on one Doris Campbell's headstone. He was notorious for burning money, and had been barred from everywhere but the Corner Store for burning the tips left at the tables. He professed religious conviction; believing he had a psychic conduit to Jesus Christ. In return for his manic prostrations, he was excused from any social obligation. He lived alone in the woods below Clear Crick. On the banks of his secluded swamp he feared real and imaginary demons; tied up on a short chain behind his shack there was a starving Rottweiler, and in his outhouse a double barreled 12-gauge. Head shaved, cadaver thin, and dressed in gothic black with a coal goatee and gray pallor, he was staring at the sunset, talking to the whining mastiff.

He watched her come down from the high ground and descend into the miry mists. He smiled at her detour around the screeching dog. Her lips were moving, as if reciting a devotional mantra. Over and over she scripted the indictment she would make Guerre suffer in the face of his accuser.

Nicole had a vision of this moment. But reality does not a vision make. Over and over, she had rehearsed the pointing of the gun, the coercing of the final confession and plea for forgiveness, the revelation that some divine or natural justice should prevail over human ignorance. She saw herself as an instrument of absolute justice, beyond celestial or terrestrial accountability. She envisioned a blast to the stomach, a gut shot that would give Guerre that moment of grim recognition. But this is not what happened.

Standing before Claude Guerre, Nicole felt (more than an urge to avenge her father) the necessity to compensate the degradation she had purposely initiated--a self inflicted outrage. Now she had to kill him, having suffered an absolute dishonor. The premeditation was over.

Recognizing the look and smell of insanity, she played to Guerre's disease, invoked the demons they shared, mentioned Lina Flately's name, insinuated other victims, and abruptly stopped, feigning weakness, as if overcome by emotion. Her behavior confused him; retreating to the shack, Guerre searched the hovel for the instruments of his criminal madness: the knife and the chloroform.

By the time he returned, she had the 12-gauge. She pulled both triggers at once. Guerre's emaciated torso imploded in a whoosh and whump of cordite and gore. The sheer force of the blast sent the knife through the bottom of his chin and out the crown, impaling his head like a skewered olive. His face contorted in angry astonishment; the bloody mouth gurgling vile obscenities. When the disembodied voice refused to cease, she reloaded and shot him again. She reloaded. The dog, straining at its rusting tether, howled incessantly. A gusher of blood overflowed the broken yellow teeth and spattered his beard and boots.

Nicole now held court over the convulsing body, as she began her long rehearsed indictment: "Retribution is my redemption; my Father is avenged," but it didn't matter, because Guerre was no more. She would never know if he understood his executioner. The dog's maniacal barking shattered her trance-like stupor. The unholy howl trailed off in the whine of the icy lake wind as she headed south along Peep-A-Day road.